So now that you’ve had a look at where the top scorers in the AIHL come from, and been bored by the technical details – how do different leagues compare to each other?
As we saw in the piece on AIHL scoring, the “value” of a point differs across different hockey leagues. So how do we compare across these leagues? This piece uses the approach previously discussed (How to compare one hockey league to another) to compare across 47 different hockey leagues to see what a point-per-game player in one league is equivalent to in another league.
So which league is best?
Table 1 shows a ranking of how hard it is to score in a given league, all relative to the ECHL. The number (ECHL Point ratio) is what a player scoring at 1 point per game (P/G) in that league is equivalent to in the ECHL. This uses 3 decimal places mainly because leagues at the lower end are quite close together – so apologies for the avalanche of numbers. The ‘Games per point’ column takes this from another angle – and shows how many games it would take (on average) a point-per-game player in that league to score a point in the ECHL.
Table 1: Hockey Leagues by ECHL Point Ratio
League | ECHL Point ratio | Games per point | Country | Tier | |
1 | National Hockey League | 8.101 | 0.1 | US/Canada | 1st |
2 | Kontinental Hockey League | 4.199 | 0.2 | Russia/Belarus/ Kazakhstan/ China | 1st |
3 | Swedish Hockey League | 3.884 | 0.3 | Sweden | 1st |
4 | Extraliga (CZE) | 3.607 | 0.3 | Czechia | 1st |
5 | American Hockey League | 3.005 | 0.3 | US/Canada | 2nd |
6 | National League (Sui) | 2.751 | 0.4 | Switzerland | 1st |
7 | Deutsche Eishockey Liga | 2.327 | 0.4 | Germany | 1st |
8 | Liiga | 2.255 | 0.4 | Finland | 1st |
9 | Allsvenskan | 1.591 | 0.6 | Sweden | 2nd |
10 | International Central European (ICE) Hockey League | 1.534 | 0.7 | Austria/Italy/ Hungary/Slovenia | 1st |
11 | Vysshaya Hokkeinaya Liga | 1.378 | 0.7 | Russia | 2nd |
12 | NCAA | 1.076 | 0.9 | US | College |
13 | Extraliga (SVK) | 1.065 | 0.9 | Slovakia | 1st |
14 | ECHL | 1.000 | 1.0 | US/Canada | 3rd |
15 | 1. Liga (Cze) | 0.918 | 1.1 | Czechia | 2nd |
16 | Deutsche Eishockey Liga 2 | 0.904 | 1.1 | Germany | 2nd |
17 | Metal Ligaen | 0.862 | 1.2 | Denmark | 1st |
18 | Elite Ice Hockey League | 0.830 | 1.2 | UK | 1st |
19 | EliteHockey Ligaen | 0.798 | 1.3 | Norway | 1st |
20 | Asia League Ice Hockey | 0.778 | 1.3 | Japan/South Korea | 1st |
21 | Swiss League | 0.753 | 1.3 | Switzerland | 2nd |
22 | Mestis | 0.686 | 1.5 | Finland | 2nd |
23 | Ligue Magnus | 0.632 | 1.6 | France | 1st |
24 | United States Hockey League | 0.559 | 1.8 | US | Junior |
25 | Polska Hokej Liga | 0.543 | 1.8 | Poland | 1st |
26 | Usports | 0.511 | 2.0 | Canada | College |
27 | Chinook Hockey League | 0.484 | 2.1 | Canada | 4th* |
28 | HockeyEttan | 0.478 | 2.1 | Sweden | 3rd |
29 | Erste Liga | 0.453 | 2.2 | Hungary/ Romania | 2nd* |
30 | Southern Professional Hockey League | 0.426 | 2.3 | US | 4th |
31 | Ligue Nord-Americaine de Hockey | 0.405 | 2.5 | Canada | 4th* |
32 | Alps Hockey League | 0.375 | 2.7 | Austria/Italy/ Slovenia | 2nd |
33 | Allan Cup Hockey | 0.370 | 2.7 | Canada | 4th* |
34 | Oberliga | 0.362 | 2.8 | Germany | 3rd |
35 | NCAA III | 0.263 | 3.8 | US | College |
36 | 1. Liga (Svk) | 0.259 | 3.9 | Slovakia | 2nd |
37 | FFHG Division 1 (Fra) | 0.249 | 4.0 | France | 2nd |
38 | 2. Liga (Cze) | 0.246 | 4.1 | Czechia | 3rd |
39 | Romanian Hockey League | 0.189 | 5.3 | Romania | 2nd* |
40 | Suomi-Sarja | 0.182 | 5.5 | Finland | 3rd |
41 | Australian Ice Hockey League | 0.145 | 6.9 | Australia | 1st |
42 | Division 2 (Swe) | 0.129 | 7.8 | Sweden | 4th |
43 | BeNeLiga | 0.127 | 7.9 | Belgium/ Netherlands | 1st |
44 | Regionaliga | 0.123 | 8.1 | Germany | 4th |
45 | National Ice Hockey League | 0.122 | 8.2 | UK (England) | 2nd |
46 | Federal Prospects Hockey League | 0.113 | 8.9 | US | 5th |
NR | New Zealand Ice Hockey League | 0.030 | 33.5 | NZ | 1st |
How about the AIHL?
To put an AIHL lens on this, these numbers suggest a point-per-game player in the AIHL would pick up a point approximately once every 7 games (6.9 to be pedantic about it) in the ECHL. Some players with a career record around this mark who have recently featured are:
- Ethan Hawes
- Kenny Hayashi
- Cam Todd
- Vadim Virjassov
- Matt Monaghan
Which is a collection of some very solid AIHL players – showing the difficulty of scoring in a league like the ECHL.
And some examples from the 2023 season:
- Tyler Kubara
- Riley Langille
- Arum Rapchuk
- Jake Pappalardo
- Rob Haselhurst
Similarly, if we took a point-per-game player in the NHL (across the whole 2022-23 season this includes John Tavares, Nico Hischier and Jack Eichel) and put them into the ECHL, this analysis would expect them to put up 8.101 points per game. In reality, we know that isn’t really the case (as maintaining that many points is almost impossible) – but there is also a reason guys like Tavares aren’t getting sent down to Newfoundland in the ECHL.
How strong is this conclusion?
So now all the nerdy crap about how it is done is covered, does it mean we can tell definitively that players from my team are going to lift the Cup – and which league is best?[i]
All caveats aside, it is always reassuring when you get an expected result at the top – and the NHL rates as far and away the hardest league to score in, which it should. Table 3 shows the ECHL point ratio for each of the leagues, as well as the standard error around this average estimate. In short, the standard error shows how ‘precise’ the estimate is – the bigger the range of the standard error, the more ‘rubbery’ the estimate is. This is a way of showing the uncertainty around things.
Table 3: Hockey Leagues with ECHL Point equivalent and standard errors
League | ECHL Point ratio | Less 1SE | Plus 1SE | |
1 | National Hockey League | 8.101 | 7.301 | 8.902 |
2 | Kontinental Hockey League | 4.199 | 3.675 | 4.724 |
3 | Swedish Hockey League | 3.884 | 2.811 | 4.958 |
4 | Extraliga (CZE) | 3.607 | 2.566 | 4.648 |
5 | American Hockey League | 3.005 | 2.699 | 3.311 |
6 | National League (Sui) | 2.751 | 2.318 | 3.183 |
7 | Deutsche Eishockey Liga | 2.327 | 1.458 | 3.197 |
8 | Liiga | 2.255 | 2.001 | 2.508 |
9 | Allsvenskan | 1.591 | 1.215 | 1.966 |
10 | ICEHL | 1.534 | 1.167 | 1.902 |
11 | Vysshaya Hokkeinaya Liga | 1.378 | 0.805 | 1.952 |
12 | NCAA | 1.076 | 0.964 | 1.188 |
13 | Extraliga (SVK) | 1.065 | 0.937 | 1.192 |
14 | ECHL | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
15 | 1. Liga (Cze) | 0.918 | 0.676 | 1.161 |
16 | Deutsche Eishockey Liga 2 | 0.904 | 0.749 | 1.058 |
17 | Metal Ligaen | 0.862 | 0.759 | 0.965 |
18 | Elite Ice Hockey League | 0.830 | 0.707 | 0.954 |
19 | EliteHockey Ligaen | 0.798 | 0.683 | 0.914 |
20 | Asia League Ice Hockey | 0.778 | 0.308 | 1.248 |
21 | Swiss League | 0.753 | 0.225 | 1.280 |
22 | Mestis | 0.686 | 0.377 | 0.994 |
23 | Ligue Magnus | 0.632 | 0.559 | 0.705 |
24 | United States Hockey League | 0.559 | 0.398 | 0.720 |
25 | Polska Hokej Liga | 0.543 | 0.291 | 0.795 |
26 | Usports | 0.511 | 0.440 | 0.582 |
27 | Chinook Hockey League | 0.484 | 0.320 | 0.647 |
28 | HockeyEttan | 0.478 | 0.054 | 0.901 |
29 | Erste Liga | 0.453 | 0.391 | 0.514 |
30 | Southern Professional Hockey League | 0.426 | 0.364 | 0.489 |
31 | Ligue Nord-Americaine de Hockey | 0.405 | 0.209 | 0.601 |
32 | Alps Hockey League | 0.375 | -0.030 | 0.780 |
33 | Allan Cup Hockey | 0.370 | 0.181 | 0.559 |
34 | Oberliga | 0.362 | 0.145 | 0.580 |
35 | NCAA III | 0.263 | 0.093 | 0.432 |
36 | 1. Liga (Svk) | 0.259 | 0.148 | 0.370 |
37 | FFHG Division 1 (Fra) | 0.249 | 0.115 | 0.383 |
38 | 2. Liga (Cze) | 0.246 | -0.040 | 0.532 |
39 | Romanian Hockey League | 0.189 | 0.087 | 0.290 |
40 | Suomi-Sarja | 0.182 | -0.188 | 0.552 |
41 | Australian Ice Hockey League | 0.145 | 0.111 | 0.180 |
42 | Division 2 (Swe) | 0.129 | -0.344 | 0.601 |
43 | BeNeLiga | 0.127 | -0.266 | 0.519 |
44 | Regionaliga | 0.123 | -0.193 | 0.440 |
45 | National Ice Hockey League | 0.122 | -0.034 | 0.278 |
46 | Federal Prospects Hockey League | 0.113 | 0.011 | 0.215 |
NR | New Zealand Ice Hockey League | 0.030 | 0.030 | 0.030 |
Firstly, I include the NZIHL here more for interest than any science – as there are a number of leagues around the world which would be included if we wanted a more fulsome look at leagues to the same level. Similarly, the lack of data points between the NZIHL and AIHL (15 players, 19 transactions) meant the standard error is ignored here.
Which leagues are similar?
In (very) broad terms, I break the leagues down into six groups (or seven, but the seventh is just the NHL) with very loose borders:
- Best outside the Show – (KHL, SHL, Czech Extraliga, AHL, National League, DEL, Liiga)
- Strong upper level – Allsvenskan, ICEHL, VHL
- Upper middle tier – NCAA, Slovak Extraliga, ECHL, Czech 1. Liga, DEL2, Metal Ligaen, EIHL
- Lower middle tier – Norway, Asia, Swiss League, Mestis, Ligue Magnus, USHL, Poland, Usports, Chinook HL, HockeyEttan, Erste Liga, SPHL, LNAH
- Lower pro* tier – AlpsHL, Allan Cup, Oberliga, Slovak 1. Liga, NCAA III, France Div 1, Czech 2. Liga
- Semi-pro tier – Romania, Suomi-sarja, AIHL, Division 2 (Sweden), BeNeLiga, Regionaliga (Ger), NIHL, FPHL.
As with all of these comparisons, there are fairly big ranges around the estimates which mean the rankings in particular are quite loose (as can be seen in the charts below, which have been separated into 3 to make them readable).
Figure 1: ECHL Point ratio with standard errors for all leagues
Figure 2: ECHL Point ratio with standard errors for top half of leagues (excl NHL)
Figure 3: ECHL Point ratio with standard errors for bottom half of leagues (excl NHL)
So what?
This is more of a useful guide than hard and fast rules of where rankings sit – as shown with the standard errors, there is a reasonable amount of uncertainty around the ranking. That said, it is useful to give a bit of insight into where different leagues sit relative to each other, and that can feed into expectations surrounding new players to a league, like the AIHL.
What might be more fun out of this, is allowing people on the internet to claim imports for their team are better than imports from another team – and that is the main reason we are all here.
[i] This analysis really can’t tell you which is best – as it doesn’t tell you anything about winning or losing, just scoring.
Leave a Reply